Future Development
Author: Wang MingguoSilver Editor Source: Contemporary Asia Pacific StudiesTime :2014-09-26 14:48:00
Abstract: East Asia and the Asia Pacific Region are characterized by a large number of complex and overlapping institutions.How to assess the effectiveness of these institutions, and how to use these to envision and plan the governance institutions of the future has become an important area for research.A scientific and rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of regional institutions functions to compare observable or predictable results applying scientific methods and standards.This article takes the following four criteria as a basis for making such an assessment: obtaining objectives, changing behavior, resolving problems and collective optimization.With this as a basis, it identifies the level of the issue, distribution of power, institutional capacity, behavioral tendencies, application of rules, and institutional drivers as second tier indicators, thereby developing a comprehensive set of indices for assessment.Through quantitative analysis, this is applied to determine whether East Asian governance institutions are effective.The results show that of East Asian institutions, ASEAN, 10+3 and RCEP are the most effective, while EAS, ARF and APEC are more limited in effectiveness.Other institutions (TPP, GMS and China-Japan-S.Korea Cooperation) have a moderate level of effectiveness.In the future, it will be difficult for the disparate institutions providing regional governance to be molded into a comprehensive governance mechanism, as various institutions will trend towards competition with one another as they develop.
Of the various institutions, TPP, RCEP and China-Japan-S.Korea Cooperation will be the most critical as they evolvAs such, we must positively consider China’s strategy direction and policy choices, and be objective in our consideration of the development of the East Asia region’s disparate governance institution.
About the Author: Wang Mingguo is an Associate Professor in the Institute for International Strategy and Policy Analysis of the Law School of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics